 
          
            46
          
        
        
          short exposure photos can cost anywhere from $50 to a few hundred
        
        
          dollars depending on how much equipment you already have. In this
        
        
          talk we outline the techniques that can be used to take astrophoto-
        
        
          graphs with as little (additional) money as possible focusing on using
        
        
          iPhones, DSLRs and inexpensive web cams.
        
        
          
            Session BA:  SPS Research and
          
        
        
          
            Outreach II
          
        
        
          Location:        Salon 4
        
        
          Sponsor:         AAPT/SPS
        
        
          Date:              Sunday, January 5
        
        
          Time:              4:30–5:30 p.m.
        
        
          Presider: Toni Sauncy
        
        
          BA01:
        
        
          4:30-4:40 p.m.      Aerodynamics of a Vehicle Head
        
        
          Contributed – Priyanka Kompella,* Issaquah High School, Issaquah, WA
        
        
          98027; 
        
        
        
          Allison Hsu, Issaquah High School
        
        
          Using a wind tunnel to detect the amount of drag with which each
        
        
          cone is affected, we will calculate what cone is most efficient for each
        
        
          sub-sonic speed. The type of cone head will be manipulated by (1)
        
        
          changing its angle at the tip and (2) the shape of the cone’s surface
        
        
          (curved vs. flat). We can determine optimal velocity by observing the
        
        
          drag force on the cone and how the air moves around it. Through this
        
        
          experiment, we will be able to determine the most economical shape
        
        
          of a vehicle head for different speeds.
        
        
          *Sponsored by Thomas Haff
        
        
          BA02:
        
        
          4:40-4:50 p.m.     The ‘Plane Out’ of a Wakeboard
        
        
          Boat
        
        
          Contributed – Hayley B. Alexander,* Issaquah High School, Issaquah,
        
        
          WA 98027; 
        
        
        
          Matthew S. Hanna, Issaquah High School
        
        
          As the velocity of the boat increases, the angle of the bow and wake
        
        
          increase to a maximum. As the velocity continues to increase the boat
        
        
          then begins to “plane out.” We have developed measuring apparatuses
        
        
          to measure the angle of the wake, the angle of the bow, and RPMs to
        
        
          discover if there is a mathematical correlation between these mea-
        
        
          sured variables. Come hop on our virtual boat!
        
        
          *Sponsored by Thomas Haff
        
        
          BA03:
        
        
          4:50-5 p.m.    Hang Glider Control Bar Placement’s
        
        
          Impact on Glide Ratio
        
        
          Contributed – Katherine Chun,* Issaquah High School, Issaquah, WA
        
        
          98027; 
        
        
        
          Catie Ball, Sabreena Rajan, Issaquah High School
        
        
          A hang glider’s descent is commonly measured as a glide ratio-- the
        
        
          ratio of horizontal distance traveled compared to vertical distance
        
        
          traveled. The purpose of this experiment is to find the maximum glide
        
        
          ratio by changing the glider’s control bar position along the keel. By
        
        
          moving the control bar forward and backward along the keel, the
        
        
          position of weight on the glider is also moved along the keel. When
        
        
          the glider is dropped from a constant height, with the weight in dif-
        
        
          ferent positions, the glide ratio changes depending on the horizontal
        
        
          distance traveled. This experiment and subsequent research seeks to
        
        
          find optimal positions of weight on a glider and to fix other variable
        
        
          elements of a glider’s design in order to determine the glider with the
        
        
          greatest glide ratio.
        
        
          *Sponsored by Thomas Haff
        
        
          BA04:
        
        
          5-5:30 p.m.    Sensors and Measurement: The 2013
        
        
          Science Outreach Catalyst Kit (SOCK)
        
        
          Invited – Caleb L. Heath, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703;
        
        
        
          Nicole Quist, Oregon State University
        
        
          A SOCK is a collection of materials and activities designed to be a
        
        
          self-contained outreach experience. They are produced by Society of
        
        
          Physics Students summer interns and provided to campus chapters
        
        
          (around 25 each year) in need of outreach materials to use with local
        
        
          classrooms or in other community outreach programs. Each year’s
        
        
          SOCKs are organized around a theme. The National Institute of Stan-
        
        
          dards and Technology (NIST) partnered with SPS on the 2013 SOCK
        
        
          with its theme of sensors and measurement. Though the detection and
        
        
          quantification of phenomena are essential to scientific inquiry, these
        
        
          topics have never before been the focus of a SOCK. Standards and
        
        
          measurement are explored through a variety of hands-on activities,
        
        
          while custom-made electronics (and optional smartphone integra-
        
        
          tion) allow for cost-effective exploration of sensor technology. This
        
        
          talk will introduce the SOCK, and include demonstrations of our
        
        
          most popular activities.
        
        
          
            Session BB:  Pre-College PER
          
        
        
          Location:        Salon 11
        
        
          Sponsor:         Committee on Research in Physics Education
        
        
          Co-Sponsor:   Committee on Physics in High Schools
        
        
          Date:              Sunday, January 5
        
        
          Time:              4:30–6 p.m.
        
        
          Presider: Dan Crowe
        
        
          BB01:
        
        
          4:30-5 p.m.     Assessing Whether and How
        
        
          Professional Development Affects Teachers’
        
        
          Classroom Practices
        
        
          Invited – Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-
        
        
          1115;
        
        
        
          Ayush Gupta, Jennifer Richards, University of Maryland
        
        
          PER-informed professional development with practicing teachers
        
        
          often focuses on deepening content knowledge and/or introducing
        
        
          specific curricula and pedagogical techniques.
        
        
          1,2
        
        
          By contrast, other
        
        
          professional development for practicing teachers focuses less on
        
        
          content and more on helping teachers rethink what counts as learning
        
        
          and teaching physics (or science).
        
        
          3
        
        
          Assessing such projects is tricky;
        
        
          it’s hard to determine whether and how the professional development
        
        
          affects teachers’ classroom practices. Observation rubrics like RTOP
        
        
          4
        
        
          can detect changes toward more student-centered instruction but
        
        
          are not designed to assess the quality of classroom discourse in a nu-
        
        
          anced way. In this talk, we discuss our halting first efforts to trace the
        
        
          effects of specific aspects of teachers’ experiences in our professional
        
        
          development program to changes in their classroom practices. Our
        
        
          big generalization is that generalizations are misleading; we observed
        
        
          large variations in what teachers took away from our program and
        
        
          how it affected their teaching.
        
        
          1. L. C. McDermott, P. S. Shaffer, and C. Constantinou,
        
        
          Physics Education
        
        
          
            35
          
        
        
          ,
        
        
          411 (2000).
        
        
          2. R. E. Scherr, H. G. Close, E. W. Close, and S. Vokos,
        
        
          Physical Review Special
        
        
          Topics-Physics Education Research
        
        
          
            8
          
        
        
          , 020115 (2012).
        
        
          3. D. Hammer, F. Goldberg, and S. Fargason,
        
        
          Review of Science, Mathematics and
        
        
          ICT Education
        
        
          
            6
          
        
        
          , 51 (2012).
        
        
          4. M. Piburn, D. Sawada, J. Turley, K. Falconer, R. Benford, I. Bloom, and E.
        
        
          Judson, Tempe, Arizona: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Prepara-
        
        
          tion of Teachers (2000).
        
        
          BB02:
        
        
          5-5:30 p.m.    The Enactment of Content Knowledge
        
        
          for Teaching Energy During Instruction
        
        
          Invited – Robert Zisk, Rutgers University, 10 Seminary Pl, New Bruns-
        
        
          wick, NJ 08901-1281;
        
        
        
          Content knowledge for teaching
        
        
          (CKT) is a practice-based theory of
        
        
          the professional knowledge that a
        
        
          person needs in order to be able to
        
        
          
            Sunday afternoon