|
Location:
|
SS Ballroom ABC |
|
Date:
|
Wednesday, Aug.3 |
|
Time:
|
1:40 PM -1:50 PM
|
|
Author:
|
Brita Nellermoe
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; University of St. Thomas
612-625-9323, nell0021@umn.edu
|
|
Co-Author(s):
|
Andrew J. Mason , Kenneth J Heller
|
|
Abstract:
|
We examine a categorization of written problem solving artifacts generated by interviews of 30 faculty members at institutions from a variety of higher education institutions in the Midwestern U.S. (Yerushalmi et al. 2007, Henderson et al. 2007). We determine how these categories map to dimensions of a rubric designed for analysis of student problem solutions (Docktor 2009). This mapping examines both the relationship of the rubric to the categories and the categories to the rubric. The results suggest that the rubric dimensions for student problem solutions designed by Docktor emerge naturally from faculty perceptions.
References: J. Docktor (2009). "Development and Validation of a Physics Problem-Solving Assessment Rubric." Dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN.
E. Yerushalmi, C. Henderson, K. Heller, P. Heller, and V. Kuo (2007). Phys. Rev. Special Topics-PER 3(2), 020109.
C. Henderson, E.Yerushalmi, K. Heller, P. Heller, and V. Kuo (2007). Phys. Rev. Special Topics-PER 3(2), 020110.
|
|
Footnotes:
|
None
|
|
|
|